Truth show that Socialism is Communism but just rename it so they can continue their efforts to separate us! There are laws to stop this.
This is Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board (SACB), 367 U.S. 1 (1961), not Mapp v. Ohio (which is 367 U.S. 643 and deals with the exclusionary rule for illegal searches/seizures).
supreme.justia.com
Summary This Supreme Court case (decided June 5, 1961) upheld the constitutionality of key provisions in the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950 (also known as the McCarran Act) as applied to the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA).
- After lengthy administrative hearings, the Subversive Activities Control Board determined that the CPUSA was a “Communist-action organization” — substantially directed, dominated, or controlled by the Soviet Union (or other foreign powers) and primarily operating to advance the objectives of the world Communist movement.
- The Board ordered the Party to register under § 7 of the Act. Registration required disclosing officers, members, funding, printing presses, etc.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed, and the Supreme Court (in a detailed opinion by Justice Frankfurter) affirmed the lower court’s decision.
Key holdings (the Court addressed many procedural and substantive issues but focused on constitutionality at this stage):
- Procedural challenges (e.g., witness testimony, document production, timeliness of motions) were rejected; no prejudicial error requiring further remand.
- The Board’s factual findings and application of the Act’s definitions were supported by the record and not erroneous.
- Registration requirement was upheld against constitutional attack:
- Not a bill of attainder (it was not a legislative punishment without trial; it involved an administrative process with findings).
- Did not violate the First Amendment as a restraint on speech or association in this context (the Court distinguished cases like NAACP v. Alabama; disclosure was justified by the government’s interest in countering foreign-directed subversive activities). supreme.justia.com
- Not about freedom of speech: The decision explicitly concerns compelled disclosure/registration for an organization found to be under foreign Communist control, not direct censorship or prohibition of speech. The Party’s expressive activities were not the core issue; the ruling turned on national security, foreign influence, and the administrative registration mandate. Other potential restrictions on registered organizations (e.g., on employment or activities) were deemed premature and not decided.
- Self-incrimination (Fifth Amendment) claims by officers were premature.
- Due process challenges (e.g., legislative predetermination of facts) were rejected.
The case is a product of the Cold War era’s anti-Communist legislation. It affirmed the government’s authority to require registration of such groups while leaving some broader applications of the Act for future cases.
supreme.justia.com
This is a complex, lengthy opinion (over 100 pages in the full record) dealing heavily with administrative law, evidence, statutory interpretation, and limited constitutional review.
If you agree that this effort to divided, us as a nation, and seek to ignore out laws, and supports the ideas of overthrowing our government, is something happening today. Pass this to other who are aware of how socialism is just the frist step in becoming fully a communism. The one that takes choices from us and gives it to a few.
The communism party in China all the power is given to 7% of the people and they live files of millionaires.